MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414081623 · doi:10.2196/72482

AI Model Based on Diaphragm Ultrasound to Improve the Predictive Performance of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Weaning: Prospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4414081623 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feier Song, Huazhang Liu, Huan Ma, Xuanhui Chen, Shouhong Wang, Tiehe Qin, Huiying Liang, Daozheng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanical ventilationProspective cohort studyUltrasoundDiaphragm (acoustics)OperabilityIntensive careUltrasonographyCohort studyArtificial ventilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Point-of-care ultrasonography has become a valuable tool for assessing diaphragmatic function in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. However, conventional diaphragm ultrasound assessment remains highly operator-dependent and subjective. Previous research introduced automatic measurement of diaphragmatic excursion and velocity using 2D speckle-tracking technology. Objective: This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-multimodal learning framework to improve the prediction of weaning failure and guide individualized weaning strategies. Methods: This prospective study enrolled critically ill patients older than 18 years who received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours and were eligible for a spontaneous breathing trial in 2 intensive care units in Guangzhou, China. Before the spontaneous breathing trial, diaphragm ultrasound videos were collected using a standardized protocol, and automatic measurements of excursion and velocity were obtained. A total of 88 patients were included, with 50 successfully weaned and 38 experiencing weaning failure. Each patient record included 27 clinical and 6 diaphragmatic indicators, selected based on previous literature and phenotyping studies. Clinical variables were preprocessed using OneHotEncoder, normalization, and scaling. Ultrasound videos were interpolated to a uniform resolution of 224×224×96. Artificial intelligence-multimodal learning based on clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and diaphragm ultrasonic videos was established. Four experiments were conducted in an ablation setting to evaluate model performance using different combinations of input data: (1) diaphragmatic excursion only, (2) clinical and diaphragmatic indicators, (3) ultrasound videos only, and (4) all modalities combined (multimodal). Metrics for evaluation included classification accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), average precision in the precision-recall curve, and calibration curve. Variable importance was assessed using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanation) to interpret feature contributions and understand model predictions. Results: The multimodal co-learning model outperformed all single-modal approaches. The accuracy improved when predicted through diaphragm ultrasound video data using Video Vision Transformer (accuracy=0.8095, AUC=0.852), clinical or ultrasound indicators (accuracy=0.7381, AUC=0.746), and the multimodal co-learning (accuracy=0.8331, AUC=0.894). The proposed co-learning model achieved the highest score (average precision=0.91) among the 4 experiments. Furthermore, calibration curve analysis demonstrated that the proposed colearning model was well calibrated, as the curve was closest to the perfectly calibrated line. Conclusions: Combining ultrasound and clinical data for colearning improved the accuracy of the weaning outcome prediction. Multimodal learning based on automatic measurement of point-of-care ultrasonography and automated collection of objective clinical indicators greatly enhanced the practical operability and user-friendliness of the system. The proposed model offered promising potential for widespread clinical application in intensive care settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→