MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414081673 · doi:10.1177/10935266251370493

Fusion-Negative Rhabdomyosarcoma: Clinical Application of Targeted RNA Sequencing

2025· article· en· W4414081673 on OpenAlexaff
Aída Glembocki, Robert Siddaway, Anthony Arnoldo, Gino R. Somers

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNADNA sequencingExome sequencingGenomicsIdentification (biology)Targeted therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood. For stratification purposes, rhabdomyosarcoma is classified into fusion-positive RMS (alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma) and fusion-negative RMS (embryonal or spindle cell/sclerosing, FN-RMS) subtypes according to its PAX::FOXO1 fusion status. This study aims to highlight the pathologic and molecular characteristics of a cohort of FN-RMS using a targeted NGS RNA-Seq assay. Methods: Twelve tumors were analyzed through targeted RNA-Seq using the Trusight Pancancer panel from Illumina. Molecular alterations were then correlated with the clinicopathological features. Results: Of the 12 tumors analyzed, we identified 6 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (ERMSs) harboring mutations in key signaling molecules ( KRAS, HRAS, NRAS , and FGFR4 ), oncogenic DICER1 mutations in 2 ERMS, pathogenic TP53 and NF1 mutations in an ERMS with features of anaplasia, a TEAD1::NCOA2 gene fusion in a congenital spindle cell and sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma (SSRMS), and a FUS::TFCP2 gene fusion in a skull base SSRMS. Only 1 ERMS in the bladder showed no reportable molecular alterations. Conclusion: We illustrate case examples demonstrating how a combined morphological and molecular approach with targeted RNA-Seq can aid in diagnosis and identify clinically actionable alterations in pediatric FN-RMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207