Individualised connectomic-guided radiosurgical thalamotomy for chronic pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Radiosurgery targeting the thalamus has long been used to treat refractory pain, with medial thalamotomy as a key approach. Traditionally, targeting relied on indirect methods based on anatomical atlases, which do not account for individual variations in brain connectivity. Recent advances in connectomic-guided stereotactic radiosurgery have improved precision in the treatment of movement disorders, but their application to pain management remains underexplored. This study evaluates the feasibility of connectomic-guided radiosurgery for refractory pain using Brainlab Elements, integrating auto-segmentation and manual contouring for patient-specific planning. METHODS: We analysed the thalamic target's structural and functional connectivity using the FMRIB Software Library and Advanced Normalisation Tools. The region of interest (ROI) was mapped using diffusion tensor imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess connectivity with pain-processing structures, including the periventricular grey (PVG) and ventroposteromedial (VPM) nucleus. Connectivity analysis was performed with Brainlab Elements and validated against independent connectomic studies. Dose-volume relationships for PVG and VPM were retrospectively assessed in patients treated with radiosurgery for chronic pain. RESULTS: Connectivity analysis showed that fibres within the ROI extend to primary motor (M1) and sensory (S1) cortices, while descending fibres reach the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Functional connectivity linked the ROI to key pain-processing regions, including the prefrontal cortex, insula, amygdala, and cerebellum. Retrospective dose-volume (DVs) analysis revealed clear differences between the volumes receiving more than 20 Gy in the original vs connectomic-based target. . The integration of Brainlab Elements facilitated connectomic-guided targeting, enabling a patient-specific approach to radiosurgery. CONCLUSION: Connectomic-guided radiosurgery is a feasible approach that enables precise, patient-specific targeting pain management. Auto-segmentation of PVG and VPM allows dose-volume assessment, potentially correlating with clinical outcomes. Standardising connectomic-guided planning may enhance radiosurgical precision and support future clinical research in refractory pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".