PEtab.jl: advancing the efficiency and utility of dynamic modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Dynamic models represent a powerful tool for studying complex biological processes, ranging from cell signalling to cell differentiation. Building such models often requires computationally demanding modelling workflows, such as model exploration and parameter estimation. We developed two Julia-based tools: SBMLImporter.jl, an SBML importer, and PEtab.jl, an importer for parameter estimation problems in the PEtab format, designed to streamline modelling processes. These tools leverage Julia's high-performance computing capabilities, including symbolic pre-processing and advanced ODE solvers. PEtab.jl aims to be a Julia-accessible toolbox that supports the entire modelling pipeline from parameter estimation to identifiability analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SBMLImporter.jl and PEtab.jl are implemented in the Julia programming language. Both packages are available on GitHub (github.com/sebapersson/SBMLImporter.jl and github.com/sebapersson/PEtab.jl) as officially registered Julia packages, installable via the Julia package manager. Each package is continuously tested and supported on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".