"Know the Difference": A Comparison of Community-Led Erotic Knowledge Organization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes emergent research comparing the classification practices among two online platforms for creative and erotic works: Archive of Our Own (AO3; archiveofourown.org), an expansive fan-run repository for transformative works like fanfiction, and E-Hentai (EH), a platform that hosts (pirated) sexually explicit hentai manga (i.e. traditionally published and distributed erotic graphic novels) alongside doujinshi (a Japanese word meaning "self-published works," here referring to largely erotic/pornographic material). Using phronetic analysis, we examine these platforms' tagging guidelines as well as a selection of tags used by both platforms to explore the structures of their differing folksonomies and the abilities they afford authors and/or community members to articulate expressions of gender, sex, sexuality, and (in)human bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it