MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414088755 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-fdf53

De Novo Discovery of Bicyclic Competitive Inhibitors of Zika Virus Protease from Peptide–Bismuth Phage Display Screening

2025· article· en· W4414088755 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Upamali Somathilake, Minghao Shang, Christoph Nitsche

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsProteaseDibasic acidPhage displaySerineSerine proteaseDrug discoveryPeptideProteasesActive site

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No specific vaccines or therapeutics are currently available for the prevention or treatment of Zika virus infections. The viral protease NS2B-NS3 is essential for the replication of Zika and other orthoflaviviruses, making it a target for antiviral drug development. Traditional discovery of competitive inhibitors has relied on substrate recognition sequences, typically yielding multi-basic peptides. Here, we present a de novo strategy for identifying competitive inhibitors using peptide phage display in combination with Bi(III)-mediated in situ formation of bicyclic peptides. In an initial screening, phages displaying a library of randomized peptide-bismuth bicycles were eluted by interrupting the phage-target interactions at low pH. This approach yielded a small number of peptides biased toward the active site, characterized by dibasic motifs, but only one low-ranking sequence showed modest inhibitory activity. To enhance specificity, a second screening campaign employed competitive phage elution using the dibasic boronate inhibitor CN-714 that covalently binds to the catalytically active serine residue S135 of NS2B-NS3. This strategy enriched a larger pool of competitive inhibitors sharing the characteristic dibasic substrate recognition motif. The most potent peptide-bismuth bicycle identified featured a completely novel sequence, exhibited an inhibition constant of 3.9 µM and displayed remarkable proteolytic stability over 24 hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207