MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414090038 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf723

A Galactic Self-portrait: Density Structure and Integrated Properties of the Milky Way Disk

2025· article· en· W4414090038 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Imig, Jon A. Holtzman, Gail Zasowski, Jianhui Lian, Nicholas Fraser Boardman, Alexander Stone-Martinez, J. Ted Mackereth, Moire K. M. Prescott, Rachael L. Beaton, Timothy C. Beers, Dmitry Bizyaev, Michael R. Blanton, Kátia Cunha, José G. Fernández-Trincado, Catherine E. Fielder, Sten Hasselquist, Christian R. Hayes, M. Haywood, Henrik Jönsson, Richard R. Lane, Steven R. Majewski, Szabolcs Mészáros, Ivan Minchev, David L. Nidever, Christian Nıtschelm, Jennifer Sobeck

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsMilky WayMetallicityStellar densityThick diskStarsDiscStellar massThin diskStellar evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The evolutionary history of the Milky Way disk is imprinted in the ages, positions, and chemical compositions of individual stars. In this study, we derive the intrinsic density distribution of different stellar populations using the final data release of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) survey. A total of 203,197 red giant branch stars are used to sort the stellar disk (R ≤ 20 kpc) into subpopulations of metallicity (Δ[M/H] = 0.1 dex), age ( Δ log ( age yr ) = 0.1 ), and α-element abundances ([α/M]). We fit the present-day structural parameters and density distribution of each stellar subpopulation after correcting for the survey selection function. The low-α disk is characterized by longer scale lengths and shorter scale heights, and is best fit by a broken exponential radial profile for each population. The high-α disk is characterized by shorter scale lengths and larger scale heights, and is generally well-approximated by a single exponential radial profile. These results are applied to produce new estimates of the integrated properties of the Milky Way from early times to the present day. We measure the total stellar mass of the disk to be 5.2 7 − 1.5 + 0.2 × 1 0 10 M ⊙, and the average mass-weighted scale length is R d = 2.37 ± 0.2 kpc. The Milky Way’s present-day color of (g − r) = 0.72 ± 0.02 is consistent with the classification of a red spiral galaxy, although it has only been in the “green valley” region of the galaxy color–mass diagram for the last ∼3 Gyr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→