A Novel Intelligent Thermal Feedback Framework for Electric Motor Protection in Embedded Robotic Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As robotic systems advance in autonomy and sophistication while being used in uncertain environments, the challenge of building reliable and robust electric motors that are embedded into robotic systems has never been a more important engineering problem. Thermal distress caused by extended operation or excessive loading can negatively affect a motor’s performance and efficiency and lead to catastrophic hardware failure. This paper proposes a novel intelligent control framework that includes real-time thermal feedback for hybrid electric motors that are embedded into robotic systems. The framework relies on adaptive control techniques and lightweight machine learning techniques to estimate internal motor temperatures and dynamically change operational parameters. Unlike traditional reactive methods, this framework provides a spacious active/predictive method of heat management, while preserving efficiency and allowing for responsive control. Simulations, experimental validations, and preliminary trials that deployed real robotic systems demonstrated that our framework allows for reductions in peak temperatures by up to 18% and extends motor lifetime by 22%, while retaining control stability and a range of variations in PWM adjustments of ±12% across disparate workloads. These results demonstrate the efficacy of intelligent and thermally aware motor control architectures and processes to improve the reliability of autonomous robotic systems and open the door for next-generation embedded controllers that will allow robotic platforms to self-manage thermal effects in resilient, adaptable robots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".