MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414091761 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.09.674984

H3.3 De Novo Mutations Alter Lysine 36 Methylation via Distinct Mechanisms

2025· preprint· en· W4414091761 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahir M. Morcos, Sabina Sarvan, Alejandro Saettone, Cassandra J. Wong, Scott Vo, Ayala Milo, Omar H. Bayoumy, Rajesh Angireddy, Giovanni L. Burke, Jack Greenblatt, Nada Jabado, Carol Chen, Elizabeth Bhoj, Anne‐Claude Gingras, Jean‐François Couture, Eric I. Campos

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalTerry Fox Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMissense mutationPoint mutationMutationMutantEffectorHistoneDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bryant-Li-Bhoj syndrome (BLBS) is caused by de novo mutations on histone H3.3 and is generally characterized by severe neurodevelopmental deficits. Oncogenic H3.3 amino acid substitutions were described over the past decade, but the molecular impact of BLBS mutations remained unstudied. The remarkable number and spread of the missense mutations led us to hypothesize that some converge on the same downstream effectors. We recently showed that H3.3G34R/V substitutions, seen in both cancer and BLBS, impair associations with the DNMT3A DNA methyltransferase. Our proteomic, enzymatic, and structural analyses now show that H3.3 BLBS mutations flanking glycine 34 have surprisingly stark effects on H3K36 methyltransferases, drastically altering H3K36 methyl states in cis and the binding of effector proteins with a PWWP domain, including DNMT3A/B. That confirms the existence of molecular commonalities amongst BLBS H3.3 point mutants while providing some of the first mechanistic insights into the syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→