MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414104839 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103110

Mortality After Childbirth Among Black Persons in Ontario: A Call for Better Race-Based and Sociodemographic Data

2025· article· en· W4414104839 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Carolina Lavín Venegas, Nicole Roberts, Alicia St Hill, Modupe Tunde‐Byass, Kasim E. Abdulaziz, Mark Walker, Ann E. Sprague

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildbirthHealth equityEquity (law)Social determinants of healthMaternal healthCorporate governanceRace (biology)Maternal morbidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Racial disparities in obstetric outcomes are well-documented internationally, with Black persons facing significantly higher risks of maternal mortality, but Canadian data remain limited. We investigated the causes of death among 20 Black birthing persons over a 10-year period in Ontario, Canada. Efforts to advance and monitor equity in perinatal health require improved collection, use, and governance of sociodemographic and social determinants of health data, including race data. This is essential for decision-making within and outside the health system to drive impactful change. The Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario is involved in initiatives to raise awareness and advocate for advancing health equity and welcomes collaboration with communities, people with lived experience, clinicians, and organizations empowered for change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→