MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414127342 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325218

Characterizing centrality: Obsidian consumption, supra-regional connectivity, and social reproduction at the Early Bronze Age sanctuary of Keros (Cyclades, Greece)

2025· article· en· W4414127342 on OpenAlexafffund
Tristan Carter, Rose Moir, Marina Milić, Colin Renfrew

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMcDonald Institute for Archaeological ResearchStavros Niarchos FoundationBritish AcademyFondazione Internazionale Premio BalzanMcMaster UniversitySociety of Antiquaries of LondonA.G. Leventis FoundationLeverhulme TrustSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaInstitute for Aegean Prehistory
KeywordsBronze AgeCYCLADESOrnamentsIron AgeBronzeConsumption (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early Bronze Age [EBA] Keros was a central place in the 3rd millennium cal BC Cycladic islands (Greece). Its material culture attests links with communities throughout the Aegean and beyond. This study uses obsidian sourcing to help reconstruct the socio-economic networks that coalesced at the site. Some 207 artifacts were elementally characterized using portable x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy [pXRF], the material coming from two ritual deposits in the Kavos area (n = 103), and the opposite islet settlement of Dhaskalio (n = 104). The results are consonant with the cosmopolitan character of Keros' ceramic and metallurgical assemblages with not only the expected Melian sources of Dhemenegaki and Sta Nychia represented, but also handfuls of much rarer material from Giali A in the Dodecanese and East Göllü Dağ in central Anatolia. The study also provides further evidence for a Cycladic and Cretan preference for Sta Nychia raw materials in the EBA. A more complex picture of Melian obsidian consumption locally and regionally is then produced by integrating the sourcing data with the artifacts' techno-typological and metrical attributes, which enables us to detail several EBA cultural traditions or 'communities of practice' across the Aegean region. The small quantities of Giali A and East Göllü Dağ obsidian are testimony to the supra-regional networks that coalesced at the site. Both raw materials likely circulated alongside the flow of Anatolian metals into the Aegean (including tin and gold), a network that introduced socially significant media and knowledge to Keros from as far east as the Indus. This congregation of people, resources, and technical know-how on Keros formed a key mode of social reproduction in Cycladic society with the mortuary and commemorative rituals on Kavos and the commensal gatherings on Dhaskalio comprising important spaces for the initiation, maintenance, and celebration of social relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies→French-language works237,207→