Cotton Yield Prediction with Gaussian Distribution Sampling and Variational AutoEncoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate cotton yield prediction is crucial for agricultural production management, resource optimization, and market supply–demand balance. However, achieving high-precision cotton yield prediction faces significant challenges mainly because cotton growth is influenced by complex, nonlinear environmental factors. Traditional machine learning models struggle to fully capture these complex factors, and deep learning models typically rely on large amounts of high-quality data. The high cost of obtaining field measurement data leads to a scarcity of high-quality datasets, further limiting the performance of prediction models. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a novel cotton yield prediction architecture—Gaussian distribution data augmentation and variational autoencoder (GD-VAE). This architecture’s configuration offers the following advantages: (1) it calculates the mean and covariance of existing data, with new samples conforming to the original data distribution being sampled and generated to effectively expand the training dataset by utilizing Gaussian distribution data; (2) it uses an end-to-end variational autoencoder (VAE) that automatically learns the low-dimensional, compact, and discriminative feature representations of the input data. Specifically, GD-VAE uses a Gaussian distribution to model the original cotton yield data and generates augmented data through sampling. The VAE then learns deep feature representations from these data, which are fed into a regressor for final yield prediction. To evaluate the performance of GD-VAE, we conducted extensive tests under challenging cross-year and cross-district conditions. In the cross-year test in Bahawalnagar, Pakistan, GD-VAE achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 58.4 lbs/acre, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 38.19 lbs/acre, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.65 between the actual and predicted yields. In the more challenging cross-year and cross-district test in Turkey, GD-VAE achieved an RMSE of 46.46 kg/da, an MAE of 37.74 kg/da, and an R2 of 0.14. The results indicate that the GD-VAE architecture significantly improves the accuracy of cotton yield prediction under limited data conditions through effective data augmentation and deep feature learning. This research provides an effective technical means for predicting challenges in agriculture with limited samples, which has important practical significance for ensuring global food security and sustainable agricultural development (to enhance analytical tractability, we use each district’s value by converting kg/ha to 1 lbs/acre, with 1.121 kg/ha converting to 1 kg/da, which is equivalent to 10 kg/ha).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".