MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414140346 · doi:10.1111/pbr.70029

Genetic Gains in Durum Wheat ( <scp> <i>Triticum turgidum</i> ssp. <i>durum</i> </scp> ) Across the Globe: Yield, Quality and Adapting for Variable Weather Patterns

2025· article· en· W4414140346 on OpenAlexafffund
Ana Laura Achilli, Muhsin Avci, Teketel A. Haile, Raquel Martínez‐Peña, Amanda R. Peters Haugrud

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Breeding · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceSaskatchewan Wheat Development CommissionU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsAbiotic componentMediterranean climatePopulationYield (engineering)AgricultureBiomass (ecology)Plant breedingStaple foodGenetic gain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Durum wheat ( Triticum turgidum ssp. durum [Desf.] Husnot) is cultivated globally and used to produce pasta, couscous, bulgur and other semolina products. With the growing world population and increasing food demand, it is pertinent to understand past trends in global food production to shape future endeavours. This review briefly gives an overview of more than a century of durum wheat breeding efforts across the globe, focusing on past genetic gains for not only yield but additional traits, such as biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, grain quality, biomass and nutrient uptake. Historical genetic gains have varied across the globe between breeding programmes, with a short history summarised for countries in the Mediterranean Basin, North and South America and Australia and the international programmes led by CIMMYT and ICARDA. As Early Career Researchers of the Expert Working Group on Durum Wheat Genomics and Breeding of the Wheat Initiative, we understand the importance of highlighting past progress in durum wheat yield to further increase genetic gains and give insight into future research and breeding needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant BreedingSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207