Predicting the Canadian Yield Curve Using Machine Learning Techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study applies machine learning methods to predict the Canadian yield curve using a comprehensive set of macroeconomic variables. Lagged values of the yield curve and a wide array of Canadian and international macroeconomic variables are utilized across various machine learning models. Hyperparameters are estimated to minimize mispricing across government bonds with different maturities. The Group Lasso algorithm outperforms the other models studied, followed by Lasso. In addition, the majority of the models outperform the Random Walk benchmark. The feature importance analysis reveals that oil prices, bond-related factors, labor market conditions, banks’ balance sheets, and manufacturing-related factors significantly drive yield curve predictions. This study is one of the few that uses such a broad array of macroeconomic variables to examine Canadian macro-level outcomes. It provides valuable insights for policymakers and market participants, with its feature importance analysis highlighting key drivers of the yield curve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it