MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414144187 · doi:10.1080/08164622.2025.2555314

Prevalence of vision impairment and refractive error in rural Nepalese children under five years of age

2025· article· en· W4414144187 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Optometry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractive errorVisual impairmentRural areaNear visionEpidemiologyVision disorderCross-sectional study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Good vision is critical for childhood development and education. Pre-school vision screening is important for early detection and treatment of visual problems, and prevention of life-long vision loss. BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of vision impairment (VI) and refractive error (RE) in rural Nepalese children under five years of age. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, using multistage random sampling, was conducted in the targeted children between 6 and 59 months old, identified by household visits from rural communities of Nepal. Eye examinations [visual acuity (VA), binocular vision, cycloplegic refractions, and anterior and posterior segments] were performed at community health centres. Refractive errors were recorded as a spherical equivalent (SE) and their prevalence was categorised as myopia (SE ≤ -1.00D) and hyperopia (SE ≥ +2.00D) and emmetropia with astigmatism (SE of astigmatism cases ≥ 1.50DC), and their associations with age, gender and ethnicity were explored. RESULTS: Of 2226 participating children, VA of 93.4% was reliably tested and among these, 5.9% had VI (presenting VA less than 6/18 in the better eye). Uncorrected RE accounted for 88% of VI. The overall prevalence of RE was also 5.9% (95% CI: 5.0-7.0), which included the prevalence of myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia with astigmatism of 2.4% (1.8-3.1), 2.7% (2.0-3.3) and 0.8% (0.4-1.2), respectively. The prevalence of overall astigmatism (total cases with ≥ 1.50DC) was 1.6% (1.1-2.1). Infants had significantly higher hyperopia compared to pre-schoolers [OR (95% CI: 4.9 (2.6-9.2)], while toddlers had higher likelihood of developing myopia [1.2 (0.9-1.5)]; however, gender and ethnicity had no significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of VI was high and uncorrected RE was the main cause of VI in rural Nepalese children under five years of age. Early vision screening should be conducted in pre-school children to correct significant RE and avoid the risk of developing refractive VI and amblyopia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.440 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it