MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414153541 · doi:10.1002/nag.70063

Data‐Driven Detection of Internal Erosion Initiation in Gap‐Graded Soils: Combining Particle‐Scale CFD‐DEM Simulation With 3D Convolutional Autoencoder

2025· article· en· W4414153541 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Qi, Negin Yousefpour, Guillermo A. Narsilio, Mehdi Pouragha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsAutoencoderMicroscale chemistryErosionConvolutional neural networkInternal erosionPattern recognition (psychology)Identification (biology)Particle (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Internal erosion in gap‐graded soils poses significant risks to water‐retaining structures such as earth dams. However, its underlying mechanisms at the particle scale remain poorly understood. This study couples the discrete element method (DEM) with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate internal erosion in gap‐graded soil assemblies and employs data‐driven techniques to detect early‐stage erosion. Particle‐scale parameters, such as contact forces, particle velocity and fluid velocity, are extracted from the transient CFD‐DEM simulations. These features are transformed into multi‐dimensional voxel‐based tensors representing the particle–fluid interactions, which are used to train deep learning models. Autoencoder models with 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) layers as encoder and decoder are developed to investigate the micro‐scale patterns within the particle‐fluid assembly. Through sequential training techniques, the temporal evolution of anomalies is captured, enabling identification of the initiation point of internal erosion. The results reveal how microscale behaviours, such as particle motion, contact forces and contact number, contribute to macroscale erosion processes. The outcome of this research can inspire further research into AI‐based early detection techniques for internal erosion in earth dams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsSame topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207