MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Time-Delay Attack and Mitigation Technique for Remote Identification of Entangled Photon Pairs

2025· preprint· en· W4414155475 on OpenAlexaff
Abebu Ademe Bayleyegn, Milad Ghadimi, Muhammad Idham Habibie, Riccardo Bassoli, Frank H. P. Fitzek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
FundersKuwait Institute for Scientific ResearchTechnische Universität DresdenDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsQuantum key distributionQuantum information scienceCoincidenceQuantum entanglementCoincidence countingPhotonQuantum cryptographyQuantum channelEavesdroppingPhoton entanglement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum technologies, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics, are rapidly advancing and offer transformative benefits in secure communication, computation, and sensing. While quantum communication systems provide unprecedented data security, the implementation security of quantum communication protocols still needs investigation. In this regard, the security of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is well studied, while there is limited research on quantum communication protocols beyond QKD. In this work, we study time-delay attacks on generic entanglement distribution quantum communication networks. These networks rely heavily on precise time synchronization between detection stations and a preset coincidence window for accurate identification of distributed entangled pairs. An eavesdropper can exploit this reliance on correct photon arrival timing by introducing a time delay, causing genuine entangled pairs to fall outside the coincidence window. This leads to missed detections, potential false pair identifications, or denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. To mitigate this vulnerability, we propose photon arrival-time monitoring and threshold-based time-delay detection, enabling adaptive coincidence window adjustment. By dynamically centering the coincidence window on the mean photon arrival time, valid entangled pairs can still be accurately identified, even in the presence of a time-delay attack. We simulate the quantum measurement process under different time-delay insertion values in the quantum channel, assuming perfectly synchronized remote detection stations. Our results show the impact of time-delay attacks on entangled pair detection rates, detection accuracy, and fidelity of the reconstructed Bell state. The effectiveness of our proposed countermeasure is demonstrated in simulation, showing that it maintains both the photon count rate and the fidelity at high levels, even when an eavesdropper introduces time delays in the quantum channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→