MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414155903 · doi:10.63095/nbseh.25.546902

Investigating Potential New Load Patterns on Distribution Transformers from Residential Electrification

2025· article· en· W4414155903 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joshua P. Martin, Jacqueline Stagner, Rupp Carriveau

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Built Social Environment Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationTransformerElectricityGridDistribution transformerElectricity demandWater heatingElectric vehicleElectrocution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As nations set ambitious targets to phase out internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and electrify transport and household systems, it is anticipated that there will be a surge in demand for electric vehicles (EVs), heat pumps (HPs), and electric water heaters (EWHs). Utility providers must assess what this shift means for the existing grid. Although generation may be sufficient, attention must turn to local distribution, particularly individual street- level transformers. As EV chargers are installed and households replace gas systems with HPs and EWHs, the grid faces rising pressure. Many consumers prefer to charge vehicles at home in the evening, placing extra demand on local infrastructure. When several residents charge EVs while using water heating and cooling systems, transformer capacity may be exceeded. This study uses data from an Ontario utility to examine new loading scenarios as EVs, HPs, and EWHs are adopted in Canadian neighbourhoods. One transformer showed a maximum hourly load increase of 706.59% at 25% uptake and 1292.22% at 50%. Sustained high loads accelerate insulation ageing and raise the risk of early failure, with overloads possible when 11 EVs charge simultaneously at high speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Built Social Environment HealthSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207