MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414159286 · doi:10.1103/dtg3-66t9

Angle-resolved photoemission intensity for multiorbital bands: Complex interplay between the self-energy matrix and the optical matrix elements

2025· article· en· W4414159286 on OpenAlex
Yau-Chuen Yam, Mona Berciu, G. A. Sawatzky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAngle-resolved photoemission spectroscopyMatrix (chemical analysis)Coupling (piping)Function (biology)Photoemission spectroscopySimple (philosophy)Wannier functionIntensity (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a simple one-dimensional two-band model with electron-phonon coupling to illustrate some of the complications that arise in multiband systems when trying to extract a self-energy using the typical approach used for single-band systems when analyzing angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) data. The underlying reason is that in multiband models, the self-energy is a matrix, not a scalar, and the result obtained from the ARPES analysis is a complicated function of all these self-energy matrix elements, weighted by different dipole matrix elements of the relevant Wannier orbitals. We contrast the results for Holstein and Peierls electron-phonon couplings to further illustrate differences between models with a local versus nonlocal self-energy matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it