MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414160563 · doi:10.1002/adma.202508729

Advancing Tomographic Volumetric Printing Via Oxygen Inhibition Control: Improved Accuracy and Large‐Volume Capability

2025· article· en· W4414160563 on OpenAlexafffund
Yujie Zhang, Katherine Houlahan, Daniel Webber, Nicolas Milliken, Kathleen L. Sampson, Hendrick W. de Haan, Hao Li, Robynne Vlaming, Liliana Gaburici, Antony Orth, Chantal Paquet

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsFabricationPhotoinitiator3D printingPenetration depthOxygenPenetration (warfare)RadicalScalability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing (TVAM) is an emerging 3D printing technology capable of producing complex structures in seconds. However, achieving reliable prints using TVAM requires sufficient light penetration throughout the print volume, which often limits the photoinitiator (PI) concentration that can be used. In (meth)acrylate-based photoresins, this constraint severely restricts achievable print size and quality due to oxygen inhibition. To address this challenge, a chemical strategy is demonstrated to control the oxygen inhibition period without compromising light penetration, using an amine, a thiol, and a phosphine additive as representative examples. Among these, N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) emerged as the most promising candidate, effectively reacting with non-reactive peroxy radicals to regenerate propagating radicals and sustain polymerization. Incorporating MDEA into a low-PI photoresin enabled high-resolution and large-volume printing in a custom-built TVAM system, achieving a root-mean-square surface deviation of 0.175 mm (≈2 pixels) and printable structure sizes up to 60 mm. These advances represent a 16-fold increase in print volume relative to the previous TVAM demonstrations and enable high-throughput fabrication of multiple complex parts without sacrificing print quality. This work establishes a scalable approach to overcoming oxygen inhibition in (meth)acrylate TVAM systems, unlocking new possibilities for large-volume, high-resolution additive manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207