MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414162869 · doi:10.46747/cfp.7109550

Revisiter les principes d’Ian McWhinney à l’ère de la santé numérique

2025· article· fr· W4414162869 on OpenAlexaffvenue
K. Thompson, Ana Luísa Neves, Azar Varahra Vigeh, Steven van de Vijver, Karen Kinder, Liliana Laranjo, Tom C. Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary health careMEDLINERelation (database)Primary care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La médecine familiale et la pratique générale servent de principaux points d’accès aux systèmes de santé pour la plupart des patients dans le monde. Les soins primaires se distinguent par une relation médecin-patient, fondée sur des soins longitudinaux centrés sur le patient et qui repose

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.037
Scholarly communication0.0130.016
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0060.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family Physician→Same topicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts→French-language works237,207→