MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414162928 · doi:10.1177/02676591251380659

Delivery of oxygen during cardiopulmonary bypass and associated clinical outcomes among adult cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review

2025· review· en· W4414162928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerfusion · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Sudbury
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCardiopulmonary bypassCardiac surgeryRandomized controlled trialPerfusionOxygen deliveryMeta-analysisAcute kidney injurySystematic review

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Oxygen delivery (DO 2 ) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is critical in preventing postoperative complications in adult cardiac surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the relationship between intraoperative DO 2 during CPB, particularly within Goal-directed Perfusion (GDP) strategies, and associated clinical outcomes. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PROSPERO, and Cochrane was conducted from database inception through December 2024, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reported intraoperative DO 2 measurements and their relationship with clinical outcomes among adults undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Results Thirty-nine studies (71,050 patients) were included, with acute kidney injury (AKI) being the most frequently studied outcome (84.6% of studies). A consistent association was found between lower intraoperative DO 2 and increased risk of AKI, intraoperative lactate elevations, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that maintaining DO 2 levels, indexed to body surface area (iDO 2 ), above a threshold of 270–300 mL/min/m 2 significantly reduced the risk of postoperative AKI. However, evidence linking DO 2 management directly to reductions in mortality or neurologic complications remains limited, as well as studies reporting compliance with GDP strategies. Conclusion Maintaining adequate iDO 2 during CPB significantly reduces postoperative complications, especially AKI. These findings underscore the clinical relevance of GDP strategies, highlighting the importance of individualized perfusion management to optimize outcomes. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these benefits, standardize specific iDO 2 threshold levels that are beneficial, and to explore strategies that impact mortality and neurologic outcomes, as well as investigate the role that temperature management plays in DO 2 threshold determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.008
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it