RARS1 integration into the multisynthetase complex is crucial for mammalian brain development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases occupy a central role in protein synthesis by charging tRNAs with their cognate amino acid. Eight aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with nine enzymatic activities form a large protein complex but the breadth of functions mediated by the multisynthetase complex remains elusive. Neurological disorders have been associated with mutations within the domain tethering Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (RARS1) to the multisynthetase complex, which offers an interesting bridge between protein synthesis and neurodevelopment. To interrogate this connection, we developed a mouse model where RARS1 is excluded from the multisynthetase complex in the forebrain. We observed profound disruptions in neural development as attested by drastically reduced forebrain size and behavioral deficits. At the molecular level, neurodevelopmental and ribosomal genes were dysregulated. Finally, the subcellular localization of RARS1 and its colocalization with other translational machinery components were perturbed. Altogether, our results reveal the necessity of RARS1 integration in the multisynthetase complex for proper neurodevelopment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".