MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414164676 · doi:10.1039/d5ee03635f

Capturing failure mechanisms toward the rational design of reversible vanadium oxide-based zinc batteries

2025· article· en· W4414164676 on OpenAlexafffund
Xuesong Xie, Yifan Li, Rohit Kumar Sinha, Xuehai Tan, Keren Jiang, Minggang Xie, Yuxuan Xue, Ning Chen, Zhi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Environmental Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Light Source
KeywordsRational designVanadiumZincElectrochemistryElectrochemical energy storage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate failure mechanisms driven by chemical and electrochemical processes through ex situ / in situ techniques and theoretical simulations, and propose rational design strategies for reversible vanadium oxide-based Zn batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & Environmental ScienceSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207