MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414167437 · doi:10.1177/20543581251368782

Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Prescriptions in Living Kidney Donors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4414167437 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert R. Quinn, Pietro Ravani, Krista L. Lentine, Alix Clarke, Rachel Jeong, Jason T. Bau, Ngan N. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMedical prescriptionRetrospective cohort studyDrugCohort studyKidney diseasePolypharmacyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Current guidelines recommend that living kidney donors should avoid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs due to their potential nephrotoxic effects. It is unclear if physicians are adhering to this recommendation. Objective: Our aim was to determine the proportion of living kidney donors that filled a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription post-donation and the proportion with measurement of kidney function post-prescription. Design: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study. Setting: We identified kidney donors in Alberta, Canada that had accessed the healthcare system in the outpatient, emergency department, or inpatient setting. Patients: Adult living kidney donors in Alberta, Canada who donated between 2002 and 2019. Measurements: We measured the number of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions, type of prescribing physician, and evidence of post-prescription measurement of creatinine and potassium. Methods: We identified the proportion of donors who filled a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription at least 1 year post-donation. We also assessed how many donors underwent laboratory testing for kidney function and potassium within 14 days following the first prescription. Results: Of the 759 living kidney donors included in our study, 273 (36%) had at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription over a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range 3.5-11.5). The proportion of donors with at least one prescription in follow-up remained stable over time (~10% per year). Family physicians accounted for 66% of all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions. Approximately, 10% of donors had measurements of serum creatinine or potassium post-prescription. Limitations: This study was limited by the inability to capture over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, indication for the prescriptions, and indication for bloodwork being completed in the post-prescription period. Conclusions: Over one-third of living kidney donors are prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs despite current guideline recommendations, with only a minority undergoing post-prescription laboratory testing. Further research assessing outcomes following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is recommended to better inform optimal pain-management strategies for living kidney donors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease→Same topicOrgan Donation and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→