MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414169131 · doi:10.1002/adma.202509940

Remorphable Architectures: Reprogramming Global Bistability through Locally Bistable Metamaterials

2025· article· en· W4414169131 on OpenAlexafffund
Lei Wu, Shujia Chen, Ali Elias, Damiano Pasini

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBistabilityMetamaterialMorphingHingeControl reconfigurationTopology (electrical circuits)Kinematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bistability enables a physical system to reversibly transition between two stable states via snapping instability, and is broadly classified as either global-facilitating macroscopic shape morphing of a structure-or local, which enables internal geometric reconfiguration within a metamaterial. In existing metamaterials and structures, each form of bistability is implemented independently from the other, failing to capitalize on the benefits that their interaction can offer. In this work, locally bistable metamaterials are integrated into a globally bistable structure, enabling reprogrammable global bistability. By selectively transitioning local unit cells of the metamaterial into a self-contact state, a specific combination of soft hinges is encoded into the global structure. The encoded hinges can significantly alter the global kinematics of the structure, allowing reprogrammable triggering force, snapping trajectory, and energy barrier. Distinct combinations of local hinges are shown to enable a metamaterial arch to deliver multi-target actuation, a linkage to switch seamlessly between multistable, bistable, and monostable states, and a dome to transform into various curved shapes. The local-to-global interplay unveiled in this work can be leveraged to design multi-modal jumping/leaping robots and space structures capable of dynamically adjusting their actuation and morphing modes by simply flipping the local states of their unit cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207