Co‐occurrence of chloroplastic <scp>ROS</scp> production and salicylic acid induction in plant immunity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloroplasts are important sites of metabolite biosynthesis, including precursors of the defense-related phytohormone salicylic acid (SA). Chloroplastic reactive oxygen species (cROS) have previously been shown to contribute significantly to disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Heyn). To understand the function of cROS in plant immunity, we coupled confocal cROS imaging with gene expression, mass spectrometry, and hyperspectral imaging analysis. Here, we show that cROS production correlates with the onset of SA biosynthesis and that abrogating cROS production during immune elicitation prevents the initiation of SA-dependent, but not SA-independent, immune responses. Furthermore, we show that the Pseudomonas syringae effector proteins HopM1 and AvrE1 suppress cROS production, contributing to virulence by facilitating the induction of water-soaking lesions through immune inhibition. We propose that certain ROS produced in the chloroplasts serve as triggers for the induction of the SA signaling cascade in plants and that they are targeted by a conserved family of pathogen effector proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".