Discerning MOS of Video Conferencing via Deep Packet Inspection and Video Context Clues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) of video conferencing is critical for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to ensure user satisfaction. However, a significant technical challenge arises: MOS is a subjective measure, while ISPs primarily rely on deep packet inspection (DPI) data for performance monitoring, making direct mapping between MOS and DPI data nearly impossible. To address this gap, we develop DePI-MOSE, a novel solution that leverages sub-application-level video context clues to build machine-learning models. By inferring the type of end devices and identifying the motion level within video content during a conference session, DePI-MOSE can estimate MOS values from DPI data accurately. We implemented and tested DePI-MOSE in a real-world ISP network, and experimental results show that DePI-MOSE is more accurate than state-of-the-art methods. We also built a network resource management platform for ISPs to dynamically adjust users' network resources by precisely monitoring users' video conferencing QoE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".