ConfAgent: Towards Intelligent Network Configuration Via LLM Agent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As network scale and complexity continue to increase, managing network configurations has become an increasingly challenging task. Existing configuration tools often depend on low-level, abstract intermediate representations, which require users to have substantial technical expertise. This reliance not only increases the learning curve but also heightens the risk of configuration errors. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential for automating tasks across various domains. However, their applications to network configuration generation remain limited due to several challenges, including hallucination, restricted context length, and insufficient adaptability to domain-specific requirements. To address these issues, we propose ConfAgent, an advanced network configuration generation system powered by a multi-model intelligent agent. ConfAgent comprises four key components: a conflict detector, an information extractor, a routing algorithm coder, and a formal synthesizer. These components collaborate to accurately interpret complex configuration intents, detect potential conflicts, and generate robust code and network configurations through intuitive natural language interactions. Extensive experiments conducted on the NetConfEval benchmark demonstrate that ConfAgent consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by margins ranging from 36 % to 100 %, particularly excelling in configuration tasks for large-scale network topologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".