MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integration of leadership styles and its impact on work motivation and managerial effectiveness in Islamic banking

2025· article· en· W4414180985 on OpenAlexaff
Samsul Bahari, Wa Ode Al Zarliani, La Ode Sumail, Indri Hapsari, Hairudin Bugis, Hasddin Hasddin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Islamic Economics Lariba · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipTransactional leadershipIslamLeadership styleSample (material)Context (archaeology)Shared leadershipStructural equation modelingOrganizational culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionIn today’s dynamic and competitive organizational landscape, leadership is a critical determinant of work behavior, motivation, and managerial effectiveness. In the Indonesian Islamic banking sector, leadership presents unique challenges due to the need to balance operational efficiency with Islamic ethical and spiritual values. Despite asset growth, reports from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) highlight stagnation in organizational effectiveness attributed to weak employee motivation and commitment. While Islamic leadership has shown potential to enhance work culture and motivation, its integration into management practices remains inconsistent.ObjectivesThis study aims to empirically examine the effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on managerial effectiveness, mediated by Islamic leadership and work motivation, within the context of Indonesian Islamic banking. The study addresses gaps in the literature regarding the mediating role of Islamic values and work motivation and compares the effectiveness of two dominant leadership styles in a religious-based organizational setting. MethodUsing a quantitative explanatory research design, the study surveyed employees from three Islamic bank branches in Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. The total sample consisted of 57 respondents selected through purposive total sampling. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire using validated Likert-scale instruments. Data analysis employed Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM–PLS) using SmartPLS to evaluate both measurement and structural models, ensuring robustness for small sample sizes and non-normal data distributions. ResultsThe analysis revealed that both transformational and transactional leadership significantly influenced managerial effectiveness, with Islamic leadership and work motivation acting as partial mediators. Transformational leadership demonstrated a stronger direct and indirect effect compared to transactional leadership. Islamic leadership emerged as a pivotal mediating variable that bridged modern leadership styles with religious organizational contexts, enhancing motivation and managerial outcomes. ImplicationsThe findings provide theoretical insight by introducing a new conceptual model positioning Islamic leadership as a core mediating construct in leadership dynamics. Practically, the study offers actionable strategies for Islamic bank leaders to align spiritual values with performance targets, informing policy development and training programs on Islamic leadership capacity building.Originality/Novelty Despite growing interest in leadership models in Islamic organizations, few studies have systematically examined the mediating roles of Islamic leadership and work motivation in linking transformational and transactional leadership styles to managerial effectiveness—particularly within the Indonesian Islamic banking sector. Moreover, comparative evaluations of these two leadership styles in religious-based institutions remain underexplored. Addressing this gap, the present study proposes an integrative model that reflects both the spiritual context of Islamic organizations and modern leadership theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Islamic Economics LaribaSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207