MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Three-dimensional wake instabilities behind side-by-side foils at a moderate Reynolds number

2025· article· en· W4414186782 on OpenAlexafffund
Priscila Scarlet Portocarrero Mendoza, Ahmet Gungor, Suyash Verma, Muhammad Saif Ullah Khalid, Arman Hemmati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsWakeStrouhal numberReynolds numberInstabilityKinematicsFOIL method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional instabilities in the wake behind side-by-side pitching foils are numerically evaluated at Reynolds number of 8000, considering different separation distances (0.5c < d < 1.5c) and Strouhal numbers ( St = 0.3 and 0.5) for both in-phase ( ϕ = 0) and out-of-phase ( ϕ = π ) oscillations. Here, c is the foil chord. This parameter space enables the identification and categorization of three-dimensional instabilities behind side-by-side pitching foils. Distinct three-dimensional wake topology regimes are identified and their characteristics are linked to foil kinematics. Four types of Instability Modes Evolution (IME) of three-dimensional spanwise instabilities are identified within this parameter space: IME type 2, IME type 1A, IME type 1B, and IME type 0. These modes differ based on the proximity effect between the foils and the transition to the final wake pattern. The study also identifies key kinematic and geometric thresholds associated with each IME type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heat and Fluid FlowSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207