Water mineralization in resource-limited locations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water scarcity is a global issue affecting communities worldwide, as seen in events such as the 2018 Cape Town water crisis, the 2021 Quebec water restrictions, the recent water shortage in Catalonia, and the Neskantaga First Nations' 30-year struggle without drinkable running water. This highlights the urgent need for sustainable water resource management. Alternative water sources, such as reverse osmosis, rainwater, or atmospheric water harvesting offer promising solutions, though challenges remain concerning the mineralization these types of waters due to their low concentrations of essential minerals like calcium and magnesium. While conventional mineralization methods exist, this study explores an alternative approach by emphasizing the use of native materials to favor resource-constrained communities with limited access to commercial consumables. To assess water mineral dissolution, this work tested five native materials (soil, beige sand, red sand, clay, and gravel), two commercial materials (calcite and Corosex™), and a commercial remineralization filter. Results show that soil (at a dosage of 0.03 g/mL) and red sand (0.25 g/mL) have potential as native materials for adjusting and achieving optimal levels of water hardness (182 mg CaCO 3 /L and 265 mg CaCO 3 /L, respectively). Furthermore, red sand contains a higher proportion of magnesium ions, an essential nutrient with recognized health benefits, ensuring that World Health Organization mineralization guidelines are met. These native materials show promise for developing a low-consumable mineralization system that could be integrated with non-conventional water technologies, to meet the goal of providing water quality to communities in need, namely in survival conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".