Multimodal Machine Learning for Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography in Pediatric Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Objectives Identifying MS in children early and distinguishing it from other neuroinflammatory conditions of childhood is critical, as early therapeutic intervention can improve outcomes. The anterior visual pathway has been demonstrated to be of central importance in diagnostic considerations for MS and has recently been identified as a fifth topography in the McDonald Diagnostic Criteria for MS. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides high-resolution retinal imaging and reflects the structural integrity of the retinal nerve fiber and ganglion cell inner plexiform layers. Whether multimodal deep learning models can use OCT alone to diagnose pediatric MS (POMS) is unknown. Methods We analyzed 3D OCT scans collected prospectively through the Neuroinflammatory Registry of the Hospital for Sick Children (REB# 1000005356 ). Raw macular and optic nerve head images, and 52 automatically segmented features were included. We evaluated three classification approaches: (1) deep learning models (e.g. ResNet, DenseNet) for representation learning followed by classical ML classifiers, (2) ML models trained on OCT-derived features, and (3) multimodal models combining both via early and late fusion. Results Scans from individuals with POMS (onset 16.0 ± 3.1 years, 51.0% F; 211 scans) and 29 children with non-inflammatory neurological conditions ( 13.1 ± 4.0 years, 69.0% F, 52 scans) were included. The early fusion model achieved the highest performance (AUC: 0.87 , F1: 0.87 , Accuracy: 90% ), outperforming both unimodal and late fusion models. The best unimodal feature-based model (SVC) yielded an AUC of 0.84 , F1 of 0.85 and an accuracy of 85% , while the best image-based model (ResNet101 with Random Forest) achieved an AUC of 0.87 , F1 of 0.79 , and accuracy of 84% . Late fusion underperformed, reaching 82% accuracy but failing in the minority class. Discussion Multimodal learning with early fusion significantly enhances diagnostic performance by combining spatial retinal information with clinically relevant structural features. This approach captures complementary patterns associated with MS pathology and shows promise as an AI-driven tool to support pediatric neuroinflammatory diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".