MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414190440 · doi:10.3389/frsen.2025.1625373

The role of data selection in mapping urban green and open spaces: a comparison across high and very-high resolution satellite imagery sources in two African cities

2025· article· en· W4414190440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNuclear Safety and Security CommissionColorado State UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMultispectral imageSatellite imageryLand coverVegetation (pathology)Image resolutionSatelliteEarth observationMultispectral pattern recognitionNormalized Difference Vegetation Index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban green and open spaces (UGOS) provide essential social, cultural, environmental, and economic benefits to a city; therefore, monitoring UGOS is critical for guiding management and strengthening urban resilience. Spatial analysis of Earth Observation data provides a practical means of evaluating UGOS, and with the availability of high and very-high spatial resolution (VHR) satellite imagery (≤10 m), UGOS can be accurately characterized across broad spatial and temporal scales. While VHR satellite imagery (≤3 m) can enable more refined characterizations of land cover (LC), its use may be constrained by high monetary costs, accessibility barriers, and reduced spatial and temporal coverage. This study investigates the implications of utilizing imagery sources of varying spatial resolution (≤10 m) and differing classification approaches—pixel-based versus object-based—on LC characterizations and subsequent UGOS spatial assessments in two urbanizing cities: Mekelle, Ethiopia and Polokwane, South Africa in 2020. LC classifications were derived from Sentinel-2 imagery (10 m), PlanetScope SuperDove imagery (3 m), and Maxar WorldView-3 multispectral (2 m) and pansharpened (0.5 m) imagery. Mapping accuracy and UGOS characteristics were evaluated for each city, including the composition of undeveloped versus developed land, tall vegetation cover, and LC within selected public spaces. Additionally, the share of streets and open space under Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 11.7.1 were assessed. WorldView-3 multispectral (2 m) LC maps consistently achieved the highest overall classification accuracies, at 92% in Mekelle and 86% in Polokwane, suggesting that spatial resolution alone does not guarantee higher mapping accuracy, and that spectral richness is an important characteristic for mapping complex vegetation. Although VHR imagery enhanced the detection of small and fragmented landscape features, such as trees, classification performance depended heavily on context, resolution, method, and image characteristics. Coarser imagery like Sentinel-2 proved to be practical for broader assessments (e.g., SDG 11.7.1) but based on our results, still may underrepresent total undeveloped space and fails to capture fine-scale spatial variation. The results revealed clearer spatial patterns and resolution-dependent trends in Mekelle, while findings in Polokwane were more variable, suggesting that local landscape structure and urban form may influence classification outcomes and UGOS metrics. Overall, this study highlights the importance of carefully selecting and interpreting Earth Observation imagery based on sensor characteristics, spatial and spectral resolution, classification method, acquisition timing, and local landscape context, especially when data options are limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it