MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414192680 · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ae06ee

Quantifying movement fluency in amputees in key functional tasks

2025· article· en· W4414192680 on OpenAlexaff
A. S. Edwards, Terry Fawden, Iwan Roberts, Manohar Bance, Thomas Stone

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
KeywordsFluencyMovement (music)Functional movementAmputationSmoothnessKey (lock)Rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Sit-to-stand (STS) and sit-to-walk (STW) movements are key functional tasks to master following lower limb amputation. They are core to activities of daily living, enabling patients to regain independence. Physiotherapists assess movement fluency (hesitation and smoothness) by observing STS and STW however, this relies on extensive experience and lacks objectivity. This study aimed to establish objective, accessible and scalable quantitative measurements of movement fluency in amputees using instrumented movement analysis. Approach. 12 transfemoral amputees (six limited community and six community ambulators) and six typical individuals completed walking, STS and STW tasks. Movement fluency was assessed using published algorithms to obtain hesitation and smoothness in STS and STW. Main results. In STW, hesitation, and smoothness showed statistically significant differences among the three groups. Community ambulators were significantly less hesitant ( p = 0.009) and smoother ( p = 0.007) than the limited community ambulators, but significantly more hesitant ( p < 0.001) and less smooth ( p < 0.001) than typical individuals. In STS, the community ambulators were significantly smoother than the limited community ambulators ( p < 0.001), but not significantly different from typical individuals ( p = 0.68). Community ambulators walked significantly faster than limited community ambulators ( p < 0.001) but significantly slower compared to typical individuals ( p < 0.001). Significance. Assessment of movement after amputation is not just about walking speed. Other important functional tasks can differentiate amputees and therefore should be considered. An amputee must learn to master both the STS and STW tasks before they can independently walk. Quantifying movement fluency in functional tasks is important to understanding the restoration of function following limb loss, tracking rehabilitation, and classifying amputees. While the study’s small sample size reflects its feasibility design, findings support future research with larger cohorts. Subsequent studies should incorporate power calculations to improve generalisability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological MeasurementSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207