MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414192996 · doi:10.1115/1.4069752

Mitigating Cation Contamination in PEMFC Ionomers: Mechanisms and Strategies

2025· article· en· W4414192996 on OpenAlexaff
Linlin Liu, ChungHyuk Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsToronto ZooVictoria Park
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellLeaching (pedology)MembraneCatalysisIon exchangeIonomerDegradation (telecommunications)Fuel cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have gained growing attention due to their high energy efficiency and environmental benefits. However, their long-term performance is challenged by cation contaminants such as Co2+ and Fe2+. These species transport into the membrane electrode assembly and competitively occupy sulfonic acid sites in the ionomer, leading to chemical and structural degradation of both the membrane and catalyst layer (CL). Such interference affects ion conductivity, water management, oxygen transport, and consequently the overall fuel cell performance. This review presents a comprehensive overview of cation contaminant sources—including catalyst dissolution, trace impurities, radical scavengers, and leaching from system components—as well as their effects and transport mechanisms within the ionomer phase. Furthermore, this work discusses state-of-the-art mitigation strategies, including material design approaches aimed at restricting cation access, immobilizing cation contaminants, and reducing cation transport rate through the membrane and CL. This review provides a mechanistic foundation for future strategies to enhance the long-term performance of PEMFCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and StorageSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207