MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414194151 · doi:10.56238/arev7n9-168

GLYPHOSATE (N-(PHOSPHONOMETHYL)GLYCINE) CONCENTRATIONS IN WATER COURSES – SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS

2025· article· en· W4414194151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandria Ferreira Cavassani, Karla Da Silva Malaquias, Michelle Nauara Gomes Do Nascimento, Isadora Barboza Silva, Sandra Aparecida Benite-Ribeiro

Bibliographic record

VenueAracê. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsGlyphosateAminomethylphosphonic acidSurface waterAquatic ecosystemWeb of scienceContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glyphosate, which degrades into aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), is the most widely used active ingredient in herbicides worldwide. Both compounds can enter aquatic systems through surface runoff, leaching, spray drift, and irrigation, leading to water contamination and subsequent incorporation into the food chain. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and scientometric analysis of research published between 2015 and 2025 on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in surface and groundwater, and to compare geographically detected concentrations with national regulatory thresholds. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol, complemented by scientometric analysis. Literature searches were performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SciELO databases. A total of 127 articles reporting glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in surface and groundwater were selected. The countries contributing the largest number of studies were Argentina, Brazil, Canada, the United States, Mexico, and Italy. Scientometric analysis revealed that these nations not only dominate research output but also constitute the most influential co-citation networks, with the most frequently cited study originating from the United States. The highest concentration reported was in Brazil (8,700 µg/L), which is 133 times above the Brazilian regulatory limit (65 µg/L). Statistical analyses further showed that glyphosate concentrations vary significantly by geographic region, with notable differences between Europe and North America. Glyphosate concentrations frequently exceed national maximum permissible limits, even in countries with stringent legislation such as those in Europe, where values surpassed the legal threshold of 0.1 µg/L at multiple sites. These findings underscore the widespread nature of glyphosate contamination and highlight the need for stronger monitoring and regulatory enforcement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.010
Bibliometrics0.0770.062
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAracê.Same topicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207