MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414194789 · doi:10.2196/73841

TruVox Web-Based Software for Vocal Pitch Training in Transgender Women: Development and Single-Session Evaluations

2025· article· en· W4414194789 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sam R Weese, Mary E Wilkens, Om Jadhav, Xiangyi Wang, Ansh Bhanushali, Tyler DiLoreto, Reyna Kozel, Renée L. Gustin, Tara McAllister, Victoria S. McKenna, Domen Novak

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareUSableVisualizationTraining (meteorology)TransgenderPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Transgender people often experience distress due to a mismatch between their gender and the way their voice is perceived (eg, transgender women with low pitch), which significantly reduces their mental health and quality of life. This is especially a problem for transfeminine people and can be reduced with gender-affirming voice training (GAVT), but such training is often inaccessible due to factors such as price and geographical constraints. OBJECTIVE: We aim to improve the limited availability of GAVT by developing and testing a free web-based software platform (named TruVox; University of Cincinnati) that would combine real-time feedback about the user's voice with structured vocal pitch exercises for transfeminine people. METHODS: The current publicly accessible TruVox prototype focuses on vocal pitch training with 5 structured exercises that provide real-time pitch visualizations as well as supporting videos and text. It was tested in 2 evaluation stages: initial remote usability evaluations and a later single-session in-person evaluation with 21 transfeminine participants under the supervision of 2 researchers. In remote evaluations, participants reported bugs and usability issues that were iteratively addressed. In the in-person evaluation, participants tested the final software prototype and filled out the System Usability Scale, then performed 10 repetitions of different exercises to gauge performance improvement with practice. They also filled out the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory for each exercise. RESULTS: The System Usability Scale score had a mean of 79.8 (SD 12.8) on a 100-point scale, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory scores were high (eg, interest/enjoyment over 11/14), and exercise performance significantly improved in all but 1 exercise (P values ranging from below .001 to .095). As qualitative feedback, participants requested to be able to use the software without much preparation and suggested several desirable future features, such as performance tracking and goal-setting. CONCLUSIONS: While the pitch training module should not be considered a complete GAVT package, TruVox represents a promising foundation for further GAVT software because it was perceived as usable and motivating and allowed participants to improve their exercise performance. To our knowledge, TruVox is the first GAVT software that combines real-time voice visualization with structured exercises, and this study represents the first quantitative human subjects evaluation of GAVT software. In the future, TruVox will be expanded with additional modules such as resonance training, then tested in longer-term trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207