MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414195398 · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2025.7055

Association of HOXB13 G84E With Prostate Cancer Among 592,158 Men

2025· article· en· W4414195398 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler J. Nelson, Roshan Karunamuni, Heena Desai, Ryan Hausler, Craig C. Teerlink, Hannah Carter, Meghana S. Pagadala, Patrick R. Alba, Scott L. DuVall, Morgan E. Danowski, Charles A. Brunette, Isla P. Garraway, Brent S. Rose, Jeffrey R. Smith, Kathleen A. Cooney, Jason L. Vassy, Richard L. Hauger, Julie A. Lynch, Tyler M. Seibert, Kara N. Maxwell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsProstate cancerCohortCohort studyAssociation (psychology)Heterozygote advantageMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The HOXB13 c.G251G>A:p.G84E (rs138213197) variant is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (PrCa); however, its link to aggressive PrCa remains controversial. Limited data from large, population-based cohorts are available to inform genetic counseling and clarify the PrCa risk associated with this variant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified individuals heterozygous for HOXB13 p.G84E or homozygous wild-type among 592,158 male participants in single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) Million Veteran Program (MVP). Individuals with PrCa were identified, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate age-specific risk of developing PrCa. In a subset of patients who underwent their first prostate biopsy within the VA health system, a multivariable logistic regression model-adjusting for known PrCa risk factors-was used to assess PrCa risk. RESULTS: Of the MVP participants, 1,660 (0.3%) were heterozygous for HOXB13 p.G84E. Heterozygosity was significantly associated with risk of any PrCa (hazard ratio [HR], 3.17 [95% CI, 2.90-3.46]; P<2.0E-16), metastatic PrCa (HR, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.32-3.84]; P<2.0E-16), and PrCa-specific mortality (HR, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.66-4.19]; P=4.4E-05). In the subset of MVP participants who underwent prostate biopsy within the VA health system (n=36,321), a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for known PrCa risk factors showed that HOXB13 p.G84E heterozygotes had a higher risk of PrCa diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.94-3.52]; P<.001). HOXB13 p.G84E heterozygotes were diagnosed with PrCa at a slightly younger age but had similar Gleason score distributions and comparable rates of de novo, any, and castration-resistant metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest cohort of men with the HOXB13 p.G84E variant studied to date, we demonstrate a moderately increased lifetime risk of PrCa. However, the PrCa that develops is not more aggressive, although it may occur at younger ages. Further research is warranted to determine whether early PrCa screening in HOXB13 p.G84E heterozygotes improves outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207