MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414195497 · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2025.7056

Perioperative Radiotherapy and Survival After Surgical Treatment of Nonmetastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

2025· article· en· W4414195497 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Baudo, Mario de Angelis, Carolin Siech, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Francesco Di Bello, Jordan A. Goyal, Zhe Tian, Pietro Acquati, Andrea Conti, Damiano Vizziello, Alberto Briganti, Felix K.‐H. Chun, Ottavio De Cobelli, Nicola Longo, Gianluigi Califano, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Luca Carmignani, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperativeContext (archaeology)SarcomaLiposarcomaOverall survivalGuidelineSoft tissue sarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Among patients with nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma, the use of radiotherapy (RT) use and its association with survival following surgical treatment remain unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with surgically treated, nonmetastatic retroperitoneal well-differentiated, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma were identified within the SEER database (2004-2020). We used estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) analyses, multivariable logistic regression (LR) models, Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes. RESULTS: Perioperative radiotherapy (RT) was delivered to 96 (16%) of 582 patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 211 (29%) of 739 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and 247 (35%) of 703 patients with leiomyosarcoma. Over time, the rate of perioperative RT use decreased from 27.3% to 5.4% for well-differentiated liposarcoma (EAPC, -3.5%; P=.02), but remained stable for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (P=.9) and leiomyosarcoma (P=.055). In multivariable LR, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (odds ratio [OR], 1.99; P<.001) and leiomyosarcoma (OR, 2.83; P<.001) independently predicted higher RT rates. In all 3 retroperitoneal sarcoma histologic subtypes, perioperative RT was not associated with lower cancer-specific mortality in either the Kaplan-Meier plots or the MCR models (all P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of perioperative RT use was lowest in well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Conversely, perioperative RT was used at approximately twice that rate in dedifferentiated liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. These findings are discordant with the most recent guideline recommendations but should be interpreted in the context of the historical nature of the investigated cohort, which predates the publication of those guidelines. Perioperative RT was not associated with differences in cancer-specific mortality across any of the 3 examined retroperitoneal sarcoma histologic subtypes. Unfortunately, local recurrence, surgical margin status, and metastatic progression rates could not be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207