MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414195821 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553792

The bright long-lived Type II SN 2021irp powered by aspherical circumstellar material interaction

2025· article· en· W4414195821 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Nagao, Rashmi Gottumukkala, C. P. Gutiérrez, T. Kangas, T. Kravtsov, H. Kuncarayakti, Keiichi Maeda, N. Elias–Rosa, M. Fraser, R. Kotak, S. Mattila, A. Pastorello, P. J. Pessi, Yongzhi Cai, J. P. U. Fynbo, Miho Kawabata, P. Lundqvist, K. Matilainen, S. Moran, A. Reguitti, Kenta Taguchi, M. Yamanaka

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónLeibniz-GemeinschaftScience Mission DirectorateLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemEuropean Southern ObservatoryNational Central UniversityHáskóli ÍslandsJohns Hopkins UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversitetet i OsloYork UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoGeneralitat de CatalunyaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of EdinburghQueen's UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of UtahSuomalainen TiedeakatemiaAcademy of FinlandEuropean CommissionUniversity of OxfordDurham UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversity of Notre DameInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasCarnegie Institution for ScienceMagnus Ehrnroothin SäätiöCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationPlanetary Science DivisionCarnegie Institution of WashingtonNational Research FoundationOhio State UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaYale UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryTurun YliopistoAarhus UniversitetCalifornia Institute of TechnologyDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationQueen's University BelfastGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanStockholms UniversitetVanderbilt UniversityScience Foundation IrelandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEjectaSupernovaLuminositySpectral lineLine (geometry)InfraredEmission spectrumAbsorption (acoustics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Some core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are too luminous and radiate too much total energy to be powered by the release of thermal energy from the ejecta and radioactive-decay energy from the synthesised 56 Ni/ 56 Co. A source of additional power is the interaction between the supernova (SN) ejecta and the massive circumstellar material (CSM). This is an important power source in Type IIn SNe, which show narrow spectral lines arising from the unshocked CSM, but not all interacting SNe show such narrow lines. Aims. We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the hydrogen-rich SN 2021irp, which is both luminous, with M o < −19.4 mag, and long-lived, remaining brighter than M o = −18 mag for ∼250 d. We show that an additional energy source is required to power such a SN, and we determine the nature of the source. We also investigate the properties of the pre-existing and newly formed dust associated with the SN. Methods. Photometric observations show that the luminosity of the SN is an order of magnitude higher than typical Type II SNe and persists for much longer. We detect an infrared excess attributed to dust emission. Spectra show multi-component line profiles, an Fe II pseudo-continuum, and a lack of absorption lines, all typical features of Type IIn SNe. We detect a narrow (< 85 kms −1 ) P Cygni profile associated with the unshocked CSM. An asymmetry in emission line profiles indicates dust formation occurring from 250–300 d. Analysis of the SN blackbody radius evolution indicates asymmetry in the shape of the emitting region. Results. We identify the main power source of SN 2021irp as extensive interaction with a massive CSM, and that this CSM is distributed asymmetrically around the progenitor star. The infrared excess is explained with emission from newly formed dust although there is also some evidence of an IR echo from pre-existing dust at early times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→