A Semantic Energy-Aware Ontological Framework for Adaptive Task Planning and Allocation in Intelligent Mobile Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent robotic systems frequently operate under stringent energy limitations, especially in complex and dynamic environments. To enhance both adaptability and reliability, this study introduces a semantic planning framework that integrates ontology-driven reasoning with energy awareness. The framework estimates energy consumption based on the platform-specific behavior of sensing, actuation, and computational modules while continuously updating place-level semantic representations using real-time execution data. These representations encode not only spatial and contextual semantics but also energy characteristics acquired from prior operational history. By embedding historical energy usage profiles into hierarchical semantic maps, this framework enables more efficient route planning and context-aware task assignment. A shared semantic layer facilitates coordinated planning for both single-robot and multi-robot systems, with the decisions informed by energy-centric knowledge. This approach remains hardware-independent and can be applied across diverse platforms, such as indoor service robots and ground-based autonomous vehicles. Experimental validation using a differential-drive mobile platform in a structured indoor setting demonstrates improvements in energy efficiency, the robustness of planning, and the quality of the task distribution. This framework effectively connects high-level symbolic reasoning with low-level energy behavior, providing a unified mechanism for energy-informed semantic decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".