MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414200905 · doi:10.1080/14742837.2025.2554597

Movement prefiguration as vocabulary of motive: enacting neofascist ideals in <i>CasaPound Italia</i>

2025· article· en· W4414200905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial movement studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMovement (music)VocabularySocial movementAction (physics)Semiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased attention to prefiguration in movement research is raising challenging questions about the nature, scope, and operationalization of this concept. We make the case for treating prefiguration as a vocabulary of motive and leverage a historical shift that we identify in the concept’s meaning by introducing a typology that transcends the left-right cleavage: political, social, and personal forms of prefiguration. We hypothesize that movements bundle these forms differently: reformist movements will have a social/personal bundle while revolutionary movements have a political/social bundle. In contrast to this hypothesis, analysis of a far-right movement finds all three forms of prefiguration. This suggests an asymmetry with left-wing prefiguration. Findings from this study have implications for the conceptualization, analysis, and cumulative understanding of movement prefiguration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it