Abertura financeira e crises financeiras: evidências econométricas*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo Esse trabalho realiza uma investigação empírica sobre as relações entre abertura financeira e crises financeiras. São utilizados dados para 160 países durante o período 1970-2011 e são estimados modelos não lineares de dados em painel para a probabilidade de crises financeiras. Os resultados encontrados indicam: i) Para a amostra de 160 países avançados, emergentes e em desenvolvimento, há evidências de que maior abertura financeira diminui a probabilidade de crise cambial e de crise da dívida soberana, além de aumentar a probabilidade de crise bancária; ii) Para a amostra de 33 países avançados, há evidências de que maior abertura financeira diminui a probabilidade de crise cambial e não há relação estatisticamente significativa entre abertura financeira e probabilidade de crise bancária; iii) Para a amostra de 127 países emergentes e em desenvolvimento, não há relação estatisticamente significativa entre abertura financeira e a probabilidade de crise cambial, crise bancária e crise da dívida soberana. JEL: F41, F36, G01.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".