Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contemporary Europe is witnessing a surge in radical-right leaders, parties, movements and knowledge producers who seek and proclaim a new world order. Consulting texts collected from different media and forms of communication, this paper asks how these actors view ‘the Anglosphere’, a distinct geopolitical space that challenges seemingly stable ′Western′ and ′Euro-Atlantic′ identities. ‘The’ European radical being a kind of empty signifier, the analysis identifies discourses that simultaneously inform and challenge each other. ‘National conservatism’ treats the Anglosphere as part of a singular Western world — albeit one overwhelmed by the worst excesses of liberalism. ‘Anglo-skepticism’ constructs the Anglosphere as Other, a blend of America's uninvited imperialism and an Anglo-Saxon civilisation-state. ‘Neo-Eurasianism’ agrees with ‘Anglo-skepticism’ on the Anglosphere’s fundamental otherness but casts it as an enemy rather than a mere rival. The three discourses suggest contrasting and complementary understanding of international order. National conservatives aim to morally and politically recast the West. In contrast, Anglo-skeptics and neo-Eurasianists abandon this aspiration, instead emphasising greater ‘sovereignty’ and ‘strategic independence’ for Europe. As these previously fringe visions seep into the European political mainstream, they gain significance for the current international reordering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".