MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414208031 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2239

Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale

2025· article· en· W4414208031 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonas Montvidas, E. Zauka, Virginija Adomaitienė

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Positive and Negative Syndrome ScaleScale (ratio)Rating scaleNegative symptomLithuanianDiscriminant validityDepression (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Negative symptoms of schizophrenia include abulia, anhedonia, alogia, blunted affect, and social isolation. These symptoms strongly correlate with health-related quality of life and treatment outcomes. (Azaiez et al., 2018; Galderisi et al., 2018; Kirkpatrick et al., 2006). According to current negative symptoms diagnosis and treatment guidelines, the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) is the instrument of choice for the psychometric evaluation of negative symptoms (Galderisi et al., 2021). Unfortunately, BNSS was not available in Lithuania. Objectives To validate the Lithuanian version of the BNSS in a Lithuanian-speaking sample. Methods We performed a double translation from English to Lithuanian and then back to English. The final version of the Lithuanian BNSS (Lit-BNSS) was finalized according to comments from two native Lithuanian-speaking experts, who evaluated the forward translation, and the representatives of the authors of the BNSS, who evaluated the back translation. We performed a validation study in an inpatient setting in a university hospital in Lithuania and asked patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis according to ICD-10 to participate in the study. We evaluated the included patients with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (SNS), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). PANSS Marder factors were calculated for more accurate PANSS scores. We check the convergent validity with the Marder negative symptoms factor, the total score of SNS, and the discriminant validity with the Marder positive symptoms factor, MADRS, and CDSS total scores. Results The study included 122 patients. The Lit-BNSS showed great internal consistency for the 13 items (α=0,944) and good consistency for six subscores (α=0,874). Convergent validity was good, with the total score of Lit-BNSS having a strong positive correlation with the Marder negative symptoms factor and a weaker correlation with the SNS total score. Discriminant validity was adequate because there were insignificant correlations with MADRS and CDSS subscores and the Marder positive symptoms factor. Correlation scores can be seen in Table 1. Table 1. BNSS TS correlation with other scores. MARDER-NEG – PANSS Marder negative symptoms factor; SNS-TS- SNS total score; MARDER-POZ- PANSS Marder positive symptoms factor; MADRS – MADRS total score; CDSS-TS- CDSS total score Variable Correlation coefficient p-value MARDER-NEG 0,755 <0,001 SNS-TS 0,304 0,001 MARDER-POZ 0,171 0,064 MADRS-TS 0,085 0,361 CDSS-TS 0,472 0,117 Conclusions The Lit-BNSS is a valid and effective psychometric tool for evaluating negative symptoms in a Lithuanian-speaking sample. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Psychiatry→Same topicResilience and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→