Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Negative symptoms of schizophrenia include abulia, anhedonia, alogia, blunted affect, and social isolation. These symptoms strongly correlate with health-related quality of life and treatment outcomes. (Azaiez et al., 2018; Galderisi et al., 2018; Kirkpatrick et al., 2006). According to current negative symptoms diagnosis and treatment guidelines, the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) is the instrument of choice for the psychometric evaluation of negative symptoms (Galderisi et al., 2021). Unfortunately, BNSS was not available in Lithuania. Objectives To validate the Lithuanian version of the BNSS in a Lithuanian-speaking sample. Methods We performed a double translation from English to Lithuanian and then back to English. The final version of the Lithuanian BNSS (Lit-BNSS) was finalized according to comments from two native Lithuanian-speaking experts, who evaluated the forward translation, and the representatives of the authors of the BNSS, who evaluated the back translation. We performed a validation study in an inpatient setting in a university hospital in Lithuania and asked patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis according to ICD-10 to participate in the study. We evaluated the included patients with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (SNS), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). PANSS Marder factors were calculated for more accurate PANSS scores. We check the convergent validity with the Marder negative symptoms factor, the total score of SNS, and the discriminant validity with the Marder positive symptoms factor, MADRS, and CDSS total scores. Results The study included 122 patients. The Lit-BNSS showed great internal consistency for the 13 items (α=0,944) and good consistency for six subscores (α=0,874). Convergent validity was good, with the total score of Lit-BNSS having a strong positive correlation with the Marder negative symptoms factor and a weaker correlation with the SNS total score. Discriminant validity was adequate because there were insignificant correlations with MADRS and CDSS subscores and the Marder positive symptoms factor. Correlation scores can be seen in Table 1. Table 1. BNSS TS correlation with other scores. MARDER-NEG – PANSS Marder negative symptoms factor; SNS-TS- SNS total score; MARDER-POZ- PANSS Marder positive symptoms factor; MADRS – MADRS total score; CDSS-TS- CDSS total score Variable Correlation coefficient p-value MARDER-NEG 0,755 <0,001 SNS-TS 0,304 0,001 MARDER-POZ 0,171 0,064 MADRS-TS 0,085 0,361 CDSS-TS 0,472 0,117 Conclusions The Lit-BNSS is a valid and effective psychometric tool for evaluating negative symptoms in a Lithuanian-speaking sample. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".