MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414211088 · doi:10.7202/1119585ar

La maltraitance et le harcèlement des personnes vieillissantes dans le parc locatif privé au Québec

2025· article· fr· W4414211088 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julien Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du CREMIS · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)State of exceptionVulnerability (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte présente les résultats préliminaires d’une étude en cours portant sur l’efficacité des recours existants pour les locataires âgé·es qui subissent de la maltraitance et du harcèlement dans le cadre d’une relation locative avec un·e propriétaire. Après un examen conceptuel de la notion de précarité résidentielle, nous proposons un examen critique de la Loi pour contrer la maltraitance envers les aîné·es pour montrer qu’elle ne couvre pas les relations locatives entre propriétaires et locataires. Nous montrons également, par une analyse succincte, le très faible recours à l’article 1902 du Code civil du Québec, portant sur le harcèlement envers les locataires. Finalement, l’article ouvre sur une réflexion sur le laisser-faire généralisé concernant la violence exercée par des propriétaires envers des locataires vieillissant·es.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du CREMISSame topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207