La maltraitance et le harcèlement des personnes vieillissantes dans le parc locatif privé au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente les résultats préliminaires d’une étude en cours portant sur l’efficacité des recours existants pour les locataires âgé·es qui subissent de la maltraitance et du harcèlement dans le cadre d’une relation locative avec un·e propriétaire. Après un examen conceptuel de la notion de précarité résidentielle, nous proposons un examen critique de la Loi pour contrer la maltraitance envers les aîné·es pour montrer qu’elle ne couvre pas les relations locatives entre propriétaires et locataires. Nous montrons également, par une analyse succincte, le très faible recours à l’article 1902 du Code civil du Québec, portant sur le harcèlement envers les locataires. Finalement, l’article ouvre sur une réflexion sur le laisser-faire généralisé concernant la violence exercée par des propriétaires envers des locataires vieillissant·es.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".