MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414213231 · doi:10.1080/09670882.2025.2558532

The burden of history: rethinking post-conflict Irish essay films: Peter Lennon’s <i>Rocky Road to Dublin</i> (1968) and Mark Cousins’ <i>I Am Belfast: A City Symphony</i> (2015)

2025· article· en· W4414213231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrish Studies Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrish

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scholarly attention within the field of documentary cinema in the last twenty years or so has developed a new branch of studies often focused on what is termed the essay film. This mode of expression commonly associated with post-war filmmakers such as Alain Resnais and Chris Marker frequently seeks an appropriate mode of address to come to terms with a traumatic past. This essay endeavours to bring some of the insights of critics on the essay film, such as Nora Alter, Timothy Corrigan, Philip Lopate, and Laura Rascaroli to an Irish context. In particular, the essay films by Peter Lennon and Mark Cousins are discussed as best seen and understood within this new context. It is argued that these films seek to unburden the suffocating effects of Irish history and serve as a kind of medication for past and ongoing injuries. An effort is also made to build an admittedly imperfect genealogy of the Irish essay film by reaching back to the 1940s and referring briefly to the work of Liam O’Laoghaire and subsequently George Morrison in the early 1960s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it