MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414214647 · doi:10.1007/s00410-025-02245-1

Correction: Insights into garnet growth in S-type granite from Lu–Hf dating and trace element mapping

2025· article· en· W4414214647 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Godet, Carl Guilmette, Matthijs Smit, Victoria Maneta, François Fournier-Roy, Kira Musiyachenko

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité LavalGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrace elementMineral resource classificationMineralTRACE (psycholinguistics)Rare-earth elementAbsolute dating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

0 0 4 1 0 -0 2 5 -0 2 2 1 1 -x Correction to: Due to an error during the production process, Fig. 4 was inadvertently cropped in the original version of the Article as given below.The corrected Fig. 4 is given in this erratum and the original has been corrected accordingly.The original article can be found online at h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 / s 0 0 4 1 0 -0 2 5 -0 2 2 1 1 -x.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Mineralogy and PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207