MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414221956 · doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2025.148455

Adaptive offloading in multi-access edge networks via hierarchical federated learning and real-time system adaptation

2025· article· en· W4414221956 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Wang, Liang Qiao, Amin Mohajer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sensor Networks · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdge computingPersonalizationEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAdaptation (eye)Modular designLatency (audio)GraphProtocol (science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving ultra-reliable real-time digital twin (DT) adaptation in mobile edge environments requires intelligent orchestration of computation and communication under user heterogeneity and dynamic mobility. This paper introduces GADENet, a graph attention-enhanced digital twin evolution network that fuses graph neural modelling, multi-agent actor-critic learning, and hierarchical federated personalisation to enable seamless digital representations of user equipment (UE) in distributed edge networks. At its core, GADENet employs a GAT-assisted multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG) framework to jointly learn optimal DT migration and personalisation strategies across edge servers, guided by real-time traffic topologies and resource interdependencies. Each DT model is modularised into generalisable and adaptive subspaces, trained collaboratively through a three-tier edge-cloud federated loop and refined using localised attention-based updates. For efficient mobility handling, we propose a parameter-sliced DT relay protocol that selectively migrates the minimal personalisation subset across servers, leveraging learned action-value functions to minimise response latency. Extensive simulations on CIFAR-based datasets and synthetic edge workloads demonstrate that GADENet achieves up to 30% reduction in interaction latency and significantly boosts modelling fidelity versus strong federated and DRL-based baselines. This work offers a principled blueprint for intelligent DT deployment under the constraints of 6G and next-gen IoT fabrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sensor NetworksSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207